Archive for the ‘Liberals and Guns’ Category

ANYBODY WHO BELIEVES IT’S THE STUDENTS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BUY A GUN

April 13, 2018

There’s a lot of attention recently given to David Hogg and a few other “survivors” of the MSDHS shooting of February 14, 2018. However, the high school students are only pawns of the anti-gun movement. Those who believe the students are in charge are obviously mentally ill. Such a belief indicates that they are incapable of rational thought.

Even those indoctrinated in the Marxist/socialist centers, aka public schools, must recognize there is no way for a small group of students experiencing a traumatic event to organize these marches and media campaigns. The permits alone for the marches cost thousands of dollars. This group of students probably couldn’t afford the cardboard on which the slogans are painted or professionally printed. Few, even with the help of parents, could afford to travel to the protest sites like Washington D.C.

So, who’s funding and organizing the students and “their” protests? It’s the same cabal that funded and directed the last administration. It’s the “resistance”, the George Soros (Gyorgy Schwartz) crowd. It’s the billionaire One World government – Agenda 21 – Agenda 2030 – America hating Communists who are leading the mush-minded school kids and dim-witted adults who refuse to comprehend what they ask for.

If you want to control gun violence, keep guns away from the mentally ill, criminals and those who are easily and ignorantly duped; those who are too stupid to know they are being used. Those are not people who should be followed. Quite the contrary; those are people who should be feared because they are easily propelled by people with evil agendas whose violence is a proven acceptable means to their end.

The “education system” has, over the past few decades, taught our children how to be victims and how to follow. The current youth generation is afraid of themselves and can only take in the worst of society. Only a few have the rare capability to think for themselves or see beyond victim hood. Those who do are considered privileged. Choose what you like: (white privilege, class privilege, male privilege, female privilege, gender privilege, race privilege, etc.) and vehemently rail against it, but certainly don’t take the time or make the effort to better yourself for that will give you a contemptible privilege.

So, why do they want to take away our guns? It’s so that a powerful and well armed centralized government can further dictate your existence. It’s the means to the end. The end is Communism; government ownership of all property with tightly controlled rationing of food and all other necessities to the minions who ignorantly followed billionaires’ leadership to destroy their own world.

We must make sure they cannot aggress or defend themselves with weapons. They are too unstable and dangerous.

 

Advertisements

LIBERALS DRIVE GUN SALES

February 28, 2018

Well, it happened again. Liberals are able to do what no marketing firm representing a manufacturer or vendor can do when it comes to raising gun sales volume. The more insanely they bellow about “high capacity clips”, “assault rifles”, “military weaponry” and “well regulated militia”, the higher gun sales volume goes.

Let us first be aware of the Second Amendment. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Liberals/progressives want to concentrate on the words “well regulated Militia”, forgetting that without arms any formal grouping is useless against a heavily armed tyrannical government. They also like to bring into the conversation the likeness of a musket to a semi-automatic rifle.

Here’s what happens to their “living/breathing document” argument.

For my money, if some despot leading the government authorizes the use of automatic rifles to suppress the citizenry, then “We the People” should have like weaponry to defend our freedoms. I’m okay with civilians having fully automatic weapons (now illegal in most states). Their non-combat use might be restricted to sanctioned ranges with heavy fines or imprisonment for unauthorized use beyond that scope. But, when the time comes, we must be able to defend our lives, our freedoms and our dignity by any means possible from those who choose oppression over freedom.

It is also imperative that each and every gun owner pass an accredited class in Basic Handling and Firearm Safety. While not advocating for another “tax” aka license, the school or instructor should issue a certification attesting to the attendee’s knowledge and ability to comply with reasonable standards. Today, to purchase a firearm, there is a very reasonable $10 fee for a federal background check. It’s the responsibility of the feds to collect and secure the required information for that $10 before issuing a permit to purchase.

We were told that giving up some of our privacy to enact the Patriot Act would allow federal agencies to interact with local law enforcement and share information to keep us safe. Well, our privacy and some of our liberties are now gone, yet there is still inadequate responsible information sharing to keep us relatively safe.

Let us not lose more with little to nothing in return.

BANNING GUNS

April 3, 2009

Here’s the way, liberals in particular, and politics in general work. If a statement is repeated enough times, it must be the truth. It doesn’t matter if it was wrong to begin with, or if it even ever had a shred of truth. As long as nobody disputes it with contradictory facts, it’s true. It’s especially true and bears repeating if it coincides with your own beliefs or feelings. I’d like to think that I’m not one of those people and here’s an example of why I think that way.

Let’s take guns for instance. Liberals want to eliminate Joe Ordinary Citizen from the role of gun owners. Oh, it’s OK for their bodyguards to have guns, but not Joe. I really have a hard time understanding why supposedly intelligent people want to eliminate guns from the hands of responsible citizens instead of enforcing the existing laws that say ‘bad guys’ shouldn’t have guns. The bad guys are already defined. Joe Ordinary Citizen is not the bad guy. Convicted Armed Robber Charles is. Adjudicated Insane Irene could be a bad guy. Let’s keep all sharp objects out of Irene’s hands as well.

Citizens of reasonable mental faculty, who have not shown a propensity for violence and just want to protect themselves and their families from bad guys, should have the right to do so. And, I do believe, there should be a definite line at the point of citizenship. Bulk granted amnesty and naturalization without background checks would not confer that right.

Why today? Why rant about this today? The answer is quite simple. Hillary has accused the United States of America of being the primary force driving the drug wars South of our border with Mexico that are now bleeding into the U.S. She has said, and it’s been repeated by virtually every liberal, that 90% of the guns used by the Mexican drug lords come from the United States. It’s the fallacy heard ’round the world. Mexico Felipe Calderon immediately echoed Hillary’s statement, shirking any Mexican responsibility for the murderous Hispanics.

A little research finds that the statement is false. According to a spokesperson for ATF, the facts were originally misstated. The truth is that 90% of the firearms that are returned to the U.S. for tracing, originated in the U.S. But only about 17% of the firearms seized or captured are returned to the U.S. for identification. Illegal aliens, living in the United States, sent or carried many of those guns home to friends and relatives in the drug trade. That leaves 83% of the seized or captured weaponry that are identified and traced to Russian bloc countries, South Korea, Spain, China, Asia, Africa, other Latin American countries.

The liberals want to harbor potential terrorists in our cities, among the citizenry when they are released from the Guantanamo Bay facility. Overcrowded prisons are releasing bad guys into society before their sentences are even served. Parolees, at routine traffic stops are shooting police. Violent home invasion robberies, car jackings and armed robberies are becoming more and more common. And, the list of bad guy presence continues to extend itself.

Police may respond to a 911 situation in three to five minutes. That’s commendable, but what if some bad guys have broken into Joe’s home, beaten him to a pulp or stabbed three family members in two minutes? Doesn’t it make sense that Joe Ordinary Citizen should have the opportunity to protect and defend him and family using a personal weapon?

Good people using guns can stop the bad guys trying to kill them. Let’s have this administration enforce the laws against bad guys so that Joe Ordinary Citizen can live in peace. I’m not afraid of Joe. I’m not even concerned about Joe. In fact, I would want Joe to come to my aid with his gun in the event that a bad guy with one imperiled my life.

Liberals say, “90% of bad guy guns in Mexico come from the U.S. Therefore we must take the guns out of the hands of Joe Ordinary Citizen.”

State the lie, repeat the lie, keep the truth from the public and get your way – YOUR GOVERNMENT AT WORK.