Archive for the ‘Treason’ Category


November 22, 2015

President Obama is following the terror plan of the radical Islamic jihadists from which most Americans seek protection. He has done it since his first day in office, he has continued to this day and will undoubtedly keep on until he is ultimately stopped, either at the end of his term or by more drastic earlier means. The end of his despotic reign cannot come soon enough because as his time runs short, he is becoming more bold.

While he says in speeches that he wants to work across the aisle in a bipartisan way, he invariably finishes each sentence with a vicious attack on those who disagree with him, or want to modify or amend his proposals to make them more palatable, and in some cases even legal. He becomes more aggressive against “We the People” than he has ever displayed against our enemies.

The majority of our congressional representatives agree that the refugee program as it is has tremendous potential for allowing terrorists to slip by. They voted to slow the screening process to enhance the safety of Americans.

ISIS claims that they will continue to escalate their carnage as long as war planes continue to bomb their strongholds. They will become stronger as the resistance to their mayhem continues. Likewise, President Obama vows defiantly to bring in more refugees from the areas with the highest populations of radical Islamists. The more we ask for thorough and reasonable vetting the more difficult he makes it to do so. Any questioning of his motives or actions and we are declared xenophobic or racist. As with always, he is siding with Muslims, and radical Muslims in particular, over the well-being of America and Americans.

Why this man has not been hauled off to Gitmo in shackles is beyond me. Each of his moves, from overwhelming the Welfare system and bankrupting the country to opening the prison gates allowing violent criminals to roam free to threatening border patrol and ICE agents if they do their jobs to weaponizing the IRS against conservatives to prodding and promoting hostility between poor and rich, people of color against whites, illegal aliens against citizens, gays against straights, etc. is treasonous. Congress’ lack of will to stop him should give many of them the clinking and clanking jewelry as well.

Can you say “All enemies, foreign and domestic”?


January 26, 2015

A couple of days ago, I read an article about the incarceration of First Lieutenant Clint Lorance. That article illustrates just how insane the new rules of engagement have become. However, it is not the first time I have heard of such nonsense. Since President Obama took office, the military and Pentagon have been purged of the most knowlegeable, capable, seasoned and dedicated commanders and ranking enlisted. He has replaced them with goat humpers and Muslim loving socialists.

The troops recognize this and morale among them is at an all time low. They have little to no respect for their Commander-In-Chief. They fear disciplinary action for any bold move, be it offensive or defensive. They question every pull of the trigger, fearing that any direct contact could be career ending with extended incarceration. It causes our fighting forces to hesitate. That instantaneous delay is why there have been proportionately far more more deaths and injuries since Al Queda was decimated than prior.

The current rules of engagement do little more than make our ground troops targets and it infuriates me, as it should you. In order to keep collateral damage to a minimum, these brave men and women must almost wait until someone in the squad is hit in order to return fire and take out the bad guys.

Having lived almost within mortar range of Camp Pendleton, I have had the opportunity to speak with numerous Marines who have spent multiple tours in Iraq, Afghanistan and some with time in neighboring countries. Some have also served in Africa. Every one, I mean every single one of them has a story about the rules of engagement, how restrictive they are and how dangerous they can be. As a combat veteran, I thought the first one or two I heard were simply gilded war stories. I quickly learned that was not the case.

Here are just a few scenarios that allowed the enemy the upper hand. I have to paraphrase because I did not record the conversations. But, I relate them as accurately as I recall them. Language has been intentionally scrubbed for this post.

1. We saw two men digging a hole along side the road. The Lt. requested permission to engage and was told to stand down until we were sure they were planting an IED. Because of the possibility that there were civilians in the area who might be injured, permission to engage was denied.

We watched from our position about 100 meters out as they laid a package on the ground, unfolded what looked to be a U.S. issue entrenching tool and began to dig. One of the two watched for traffic while the other did the digging. Once complete, they placed the package into the hole and covered it. Each step was relayed to command. We were told to stand down.

Once they left the area, we approached the site. In spite of the fact that we’d had eyes on them all the time, when we arrived it was difficult to see where the IED was buried. We hunkered down about 20 meters from where we believed it had been buried and Gunny authorized Timmons to grenade the site. His second grenade blew a charge that would have taken out a Humvee and perhaps as many as three in convoy. We had lost visual on the two hadjis and were denied permission to pursue.

2. A young Marine, awaiting his fourth deployment to the East, said that if a rag head was walking down the road carrying a rocket launcher, they could not fire on him unless he intentionally trained the weapon on them. By then it might be too late.  This is where death and dismemberment needlessly occurs.

3. At another time, one of our heroes told of calling for support as he and his men were being surrounded by about twenty enemy combatants.  They were told by their command that, due to the proximity of a village (over a kilometer), air or arty support would not be available; civilians could be injured.  They were granted permission to engage if they took fire, though.  He also shared with me that they disregarded the order and eliminated the threat.

If these ridiculous rules of engagement don’t indicate treasonous behavior on behalf of the administration, what does?


June 7, 2014

Until the day he got drunk and ran over four children in a cross walk near an elementary school, Dan Jacob was an exemplary driver. At that moment, he became a criminal and the past driving record offers no offset. Dan will forever be a criminal.

The day that Sean O’Connell killed the bank security guard during a robbery became the first time he ever shot a man. Sean also became a criminal at that time and abiding by the law to that point has no bearing on the death caused by his actions.

Up until the day Theresa intentionally drowned her ten month old baby because he was crying, she showed nothing but love for her fellow humans. This gross disregard for life outweighs giving her neighbors cookies with smiley faces.

According to National Security Adviser Susan Rice, Bowe Bergdahl “served his country with honor and distinction.”

Yes Susan, he did volunteer to join the military. He did volunteer to go to combat in the name of this country. However, when Bowe Bergdahl voluntarily walked off his base seeking consolation from, and perhaps even offering collaboration to members of the enemy, he effectively jeopardized the lives and well-being of every fellow soldier stationed at his outpost. Some died on his behalf. Bergdahl renounced his commitment to serve his nation. There was no honor to the act and his distinction immediately became deserter.

Moreover, this is the same spokesperson for an administration that wants to hang Edward Snowden for…TELLING THE TRUTH!

What a person did or did not do yesterday, were yesterday’s dealings. When a person engages in a crime or is a participant in harm to others, they are liable. Swift and just punishment for that crime is the only appropriate resolution. He or she wears the garb of the most recent inappropriate act.

But then, if you stall long enough I guess you can use the words of Hillary Clinton, “what difference, at this point, does it make”? That is, unless you do something that is contrary to the puppeteer of Barack Obama and his house of loonies.

At least she didn’t paraphrase NSC Spokesman Tommy Vietor with, “Dude, that was like five years ago”.