Posts Tagged ‘Socialism’

RELIANCE, INDEPENDENCE AND FREEDOM

April 2, 2020

The current pandemic should alert even the sleepy-eyed care-for-naught millennials and gen “Z” that reliance on China for the production of virtually every hard good, clothing item, machine component, food processing and a majority of our vitamins and pharmaceuticals is not a good thing. It should be a wake up call that dependence on others, at any time, for any reason, is not a good thing. We can work together for mutual benefit and help one another for efficiency or in times of need, but relegating responsibility for our well-being to another country must be avoided whenever possible.

Likewise, dependence on government (even our own) is often unreliable and harmful in the long term. It is damaging to us as individuals and to society in general. For a nation, a society or an individual to function properly it is necessary that we express our every capability to avoid dependence on others especially foreign and adversarial nations. <link>

The current and recent past generations are largely dependent on others for essentially everything; generations so addicted to having all needs and wants met as children that they demand continued support well into adulthood. Adults twenty-five and up often continue to live parasitically in the homes of their parents despite the capability to fend for themselves.

Some people are using this crisis for personal, political and/or financial leverage. The governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo, is using this opportunity to back fill a shortage of ventilators at federal expense after refusing to allocate funds state funds to purchase and warehouse the inventory five years ago. Some are taking advantage of the situation for control measures to condition us for future ease of despotic establishment. This is what dependence engenders.

Far too many individuals forfeit their dignity for ongoing government assistance. They willingly relinquish their freedoms for the stipends they receive. (referring to those who refused to seek employment during the past three years when employers could not find enough people to fill their increasing needs as businesses expanded.) Then they sought safe spaces to cower and avoid confrontation of ideas differing from their own. Now they seek safe spaces to avoid a virus from a country that was never confronted.

As a nation, we have become complacent; willingly giving up our freedoms in exchange for expediency or simplicity. It is easy to go to Walmart and buy cheap clothing or small appliances or even food that comes from countries with few regulated sanitary or safety measures. (I use Walmart as an example only because it is the most widely known. Today, it could be virtually any discount outlet.)

What freedoms might we lose? Any, and possibly all, if reliance on subversives continues. Because of this pandemic, we have lost a portion of the first amendment (the right of the people to peaceably assemble). The greater ground we give up in the name of cheap and plentiful, the more freedoms we relinquish. The more we rely on others for care and support rather than personally investing the effort for autonomy, the weaker we become as individuals and as a nation.

Until this pandemic caused the nation to sequester and brought our economy to a virtual standstill, we were growing more independent and stronger. The collapse of the foundational structures of this and other nations has to do with dependence on a Communist nation whose leaders would like nothing better than to see total devastation of all competitors and economic and political adversaries.

No matter what you choose to call this pandemic, (Chinese Coronavirus, Wuhan Virus, COVID-19) it did come from a country on which we have allowed ourselves to rely. We get everything from shoes and socks to vitamins, vaccines and other medicines from them almost exclusively, and they have threatened to cut off our access to the aforementioned much needed remedies. During this time of medical crisis, we must as a nation and as individuals, reconsider how our future lives require self reliance and cooperation.

CORONAVIRUS AND WORLD DOMINATION

March 20, 2020

President Trump has been trying for over three years to close our Southern border to keep Americans safe from economic collapse and third world diseases. Democrats have fought him all the way. Congress refuses to fund a barrier. Liberal judges injunct his every effort to restructure funding beyond congressional allocations.

Now we have a pandemic and Mexico wants to stop all border crossings…from the U.S. into Mexico and they have begun stationing troops to assure it happens. Why are they acting? Because, at least for now, they have relatively few coronavirus cases. They want to protect Mexican citizens from sickness and economic hardship. Oh, how the times change!

The gift from China is changing not only our immediate national situation but that of the entire globe. Nations are locking down borders. Financial markets are responding negatively. Hospitals, clinics and urgent care centers are being overwhelmed.

Businesses are closing. The plan is to do so temporarily, but many “mom and pop” businesses will not be able to bear the ongoing hard costs while receiving little or no income. Among businesses that remain open, staffing is being cut to skeleton crews while the majority are laid off.

Citizens, well everybody, are asked to distance themselves from others by a minimum of six to ten feet; not leave their home unless it is urgent and necessary. Disinformation is rampant making rational information hard to believe.

The current situation seems to be a perfect one for instituting and enforcing the 1992 U.N. “Earth Summit” project known as Agenda 21. Agenda 21 targets global sustainability through social and economic controls, resource development along with management and conservation. It includes “strengthening society” by creating, regulating and controlling population centers including businesses, financial institutions and markets, food distribution, education, health services and technology. Basically, Agenda 21 is total control of your life and mine by a few self-appointed elite authority figures. It is a non-voluntary world mandate that we are being subtly coerced to accept.

Until now, the Covid-19 era, Agenda 21 was considered a non-binding action plan. However, if you look at the synopsis above (the constant and repetitive use of “control”, “management”, “regulated”) and relate it to what you heard on the news today, yesterday and the day before about global restrictions and abatement, you too, are bound to see some chilling parallels.

It’s all fine if you’re following and voting for socialism ’cause you want and expect all the free stuff being proposed…and you really believe it will be free and you won’t be indentured to the government.

However, if you believe in personal responsibility and independence; if you believe in working hard, keeping what you’ve earned and deciding how to spend it; if you believe you deserve to be generous and charitable on your own and not at the dictate of some unseen global cabal, world dominated socialism is not the gift you want to open.

Be reasonable, be safe, be healthy and think before you act.

IS THERE A WHISTLE BLOWER? WAS THERE EVER ONE?

January 25, 2020

There was so much talk about a “whistle blower” who started the whole current Trump impeachment beat down. However, there has been an extreme and extended effort on the part of Adam Schiff and his merry band of anti-Trumpers to suppress, obscure and even disguise the identity of that individual…if he or she even exists.

This appears to be another of Shifty’s claims like “there is indisputable” and “there is overwhelming evidence”, so don’t even think about questioning it. “It’s true, it’s honest, thus we don’t have to provide any proof of such because it is self-evident”.

Schiff, Nadler and other coup strategists say they are protecting the individual from retaliation as provided by the whistle blower law. The problem with that statement is that there is no such provision in the law. The law, as written by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), protects a whistle blower from workplace retaliation, not identity disclosure by Congress. The law from https://www.whistleblowers.gov/ :

Because an adverse action can be subtle, it may not always be easy to spot. Examples of adverse actions include, but are not limited to:

firing or laying off, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, disciplining, denying benefits, failing to hire or rehire, intimidation or harassment, making threats, reassignment to a less desirable position or actions affecting prospects for promotion (such as excluding an employee from training meetings), reducing pay or hours, more subtle actions, such as isolating, ostracizing, mocking, or falsely accusing the employee of poor performance, blacklisting (intentionally interfering with an employee’s ability to obtain future employment), constructive discharge (quitting when an employer makes working conditions intolerable due to the employee’s protected activity)”

Even in the written law, it is obvious that in order to protect the person from workplace retaliation, his or her identity must be known. Otherwise, dismissal of the person, for any reason, within a reasonable time frame thereafter might be assumed to be directed malice. Concealment can only be accepted because, in Adam’s words, “it is self-evident”.

Understanding the above and taking into consideration that the official whistle blower complaint was obviously written by a lawyer or team of lawyers, not a third or fourth level bureaucrat concerned with national security, is it unreasonable to question if there is truly an individual behind the scheme?

Congressional Democrats and others have pledged and threatened to impeach Donald J. Trump since the day he won the nomination of the Republican party. They had the man and for over three years now they have been seeking a way to remove him from office. They don’t even bother to deny the fact. They impeached him on innuendo, allegations and accusations using vague language in the Articles of Impeachment and a highly partisan majority vote in the House. President Trump was impeached because Washington bureaucrats cannot buy him or coerce him politically.

President Trump should wear the impeachment as a badge of honor. He’s brash, boisterous, undiplomatic and unapologetic. He has shown the desk and office attendants in Washington D.C. that things can be accomplished and for that they all hate him. He is, and should, be proud.

To an average aware person, it looks like the “whistle blower’ is a chimera used to launch a bogus impeachment inquiry. It worked. The president has been impeached. Now we must wait through a trial to see what comes of the sinister effort.

WHEN ALL ELSE FAILS

December 16, 2019

At the recent meeting of Women Rule Summit, Speaker Pelosi was asked about the speed with which the House Democrats were moving toward impeachment. “Speed?” she replied, “It’s been going on 22 months—two and a half years, actually.”

She continued digging the hole with, “I think we are not moving with speed. Was it two and a half years ago they initiated the Mueller investigation? It’s not about speed. It’s about urgency. One of the charges against the president of the United States—saying he was violating the oath of office by asking for government to interfere in our election undermining the integrity of our elections.”

Sometimes, in the haze of age and belief in her royal identity, Speaker Pelosi tells the obvious truth, whether she means to or not. She probably put it best over a year ago when she explained the “Wrap Up Smear”. Foolishly, she allowed the world to see the diabolical ways of the Democrat party. (Not saying that the Republicans don’t use this or similar tactics, but Democrats use it often and viciously.)

The Wrap Up Smear, as the Speaker put it, might well be the reason for the multitude of “leaks” that we see happening during this administration. It is so easy to quote The Washington Post or the New York Times as a credible source when it fits the Democrat agenda or cause. Simply feed the info you want to use through a reporter…maybe true maybe not…then use the manufactured article to validate your point.

More recently she shared the latest, or at least the most obvious iteration of the plan when she openly admitted that the impeachment of President Trump is not connected to any phone call, or even Russian meddling in our elections. It is all about undermining the credibility of a duly elected president. The whole impeachment saga began because they are angry they were unable to adequately manipulate the 2016 election and declare victory for the very corrupt Hillary Clinton in 2016. They have been mad at themselves and taking their anger out on our president.

The past week, the Judiciary committee issued and voted on two articles of impeachment.

Article I “ABUSE OF POWER”.

Hearsay, innuendo, bias, interpretation and desire to remove the sitting president from office were used in testimony to create this article. Unlike his predecessor using his pen and his phone to skirt congress, President Trump did what every other elected official does in the course of their business day. For him, however, it is considered abuse of power. The charge of investigating Joe and Hunter Biden in exchange for aid, is bogus. The president, from what I read in the transcript, asked the Ukrainian head of state to look into corruption within his government and his country. The Bidens had simply inserted themselves into that corruption.

And Article II, “OBSTRUCTION OF CONGRESS”.

Laughably, the Democrats in the House consider themselves above the other branches of government. When served with a subpoena, the White House properly referred the matter to the co-equal third branch of our government, the Supreme Court, to identify the validity and necessity of the subpoena. In doing so, this was considered defiant of the lords of congress and deemed impeachable.

This impeachment is an attempt to discredit the current president and take over the government. This behavior should bother everyone who thinks the ideals of the socialists seeking the presidency are not possible. This is the type of authoritarian underhanded overreach that can be expected from those diabolic and malevolent minded individuals seeking to preside over the economy and politics of the United States.

2020 SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES

December 9, 2019

Looking at the candidates to defeat the nationalist currently holding office in D.C., one is bound to see some pretty wild characters and plots to overthrow the people of the United States.

Yes, I called the president a nationalist. I find he is neither a conservative nor a liberal. He might most closely resemble a libertarian, but he is not at all a libertarian. He is a strong defender of the U.S. Constitution, law and order from the military to the local level. He believes in a federal government limited in size and scope that is yet powerful enough to conduct business on behalf of the greater number of citizens throughout the country.

President Trump, as I have stated many times before in my posts, is not the person I would like to have representing my country. He is, however, showing to be the best and most capable person to lead this country at this time.

That said, the field of opposition to him in the 2020 election is bothersome to me and many other citizen patriots. We see the potential of losing the freedoms granted in the Constitution and the threat of forced acquiescence and servitude to an overarching government.

Looking at the remaining field of candidates running under the Democrat party (this is not a typo. I do not believe there is any remaining democracy in the people who call themselves Democrats). What appears on stage and in front of any available “reporter” are a troupe of individuals who proudly voice their will to overthrow our current economic, political and social structures in favor of a governing form known to have failed each and every time it has been attempted throughout history, leaving the citizens humiliated and in abject poverty.

With a population in excess of three hundred million, undermining our capitalist economic system in favor of socialism would not only destroy our country, but cause a reorder of the entire world of countries. It is a step toward globalism that could only ultimately create more warring factions with greater weaponry than exist today,

Just two of the policies proudly offered by the most prominent candidates will bankrupt the country within one four year presidential term. Those policies are open borders and universal health care (Medicare-for-All). Any thinking person can see how inviting the world’s unhealthy to partake of our free medical service would devastate any economic system within a few years, if not a matter of months.

Currently, people of means from around the globe come to America to receive the medical care they cannot get, or cannot get on a life-saving timeline, under the socialist systems of their home governments.

Add to the above proposal giving each person qualifying for any public assistance program (medicaid, SNAP, EBT, WIC, TANF, CHIP, LIHEAP, SSI, Section 8 housing assistance and more) $1,000 per month and you have the makings of a subservient population rather than one of independence offering contributory value.

The candidates, through their like-minded minions, have destroyed or removed from view symbols of our history and chronological writings of our forefathers. By eliminating contemporary journals and rewriting history, it is possible to educate upcoming generations with only one view of the possible. By offering “equality” to all through free entitlements, without a history of how such has destroyed societies, any desired goal is achievable no matter how irrational it is.

If there were another candidate with the mindset and capabilities of the current president, with a more likable persona, he or she would get my vote. As of today, I don’t see that person.