Posts Tagged ‘Voting’

THE TRIAL WAS RIGGED

February 12, 2020

Even now, a week beyond the impeachment trial of Donald John Trump, there is ongoing banter about how he was “Impeached Forever”. The impeachment had the affect of ending a losing argument with “You’re a Racist”. It was false, and though the vile and viscous Democrats of the House did manage to muddle their way through and reach a predetermined and patently partisan consensus vote on loosely written Articles of Impeachment, they continue to try wiping the egg from their faces forever creviced with anger.

Crazy Mazie Hirono of Hawaii stated on CNN that President Trump was not acquitted of the Articles of Impeachment. “He wasn’t acquitted; it was a rigged trial”, she said.

Doubling down on stupid, she prattled on, “You don’t get acquitted when you don’t even get to call witnesses or relevant witnesses or have the documents because the president stonewalled all efforts on the part of the House to get the information they requested.”

It’s as if the Democrats, in their never ending attempts to destroy Donald Trump and all future presidencies, are so blinded with hatred they cannot even see their own reflections in a mirror. If it was a rigged trial it was most certainly a rigged indictment. The president’s attorneys followed the law when asking the courts for confirmation of need and appropriateness of the requested documents. It was his only available defense because he was not allowed representation during the House hearings. He was not allowed any rebuttal witnesses and, of those witnesses called by the prosecuting body, none had direct knowledge of any wrong doing. What was presented was all hearsay or secondary water cooler repetition.

Each and every witness, with the exception of only one, was a confirmed Never-Trumper and/or a diplomat who felt they were in charge of foreign policy rather than the Chief Executive. The one honest and knowledgeable voice was legal scholar and law professor, Jonathan Turley. In his opening statement, Turley offered that he is not a Trump supporter and, in fact, had voted against him. He shocked the panel when he gave honest historic testimony regarding the dangers of impeachment under the prescribed conditions and damage it would cause to future presidencies and to the Constitution. They denied and disregarded his testimony.

When questioned directly by Republican members, all witnesses agreed they were aware of no crimes committed by, or on behalf of, the president. Other than Turley’s, the “testimonies” included mind-reading and personal interpretations illustrating bias of what was said or what actually occurred.

So, if the Senate trial of Donald John Trump was “rigged” as declared by the Honorable Ms. Hirono, the basis for the Articles brought forth to the Senate were certainly flawed and essentially rigged by the proceedings within the House.

Let us be clear. The Impeachment of President Trump had nothing to do with “High Crimes or Misdemeanors” as described in the Constitution or abuse of power or obstruction of Congress. It was all about anger and frustration. The Democrat’s only position of power is having a majority in the House of Representatives at the present and they chose to abuse that position. Their anger is now deep seated and the frustration over the election loss of 2016 combined with the gaining of congressional seats in 2018 should not be a basis for destroying our nation.

These are the very angry Democrats seeking the next presidency. It is unimaginable how much destruction might be caused with such a resentful and vindictive figure in the White House.

IT’S BEYOND POLITICS

February 7, 2020

Politics has always been an adversarial process. It was meant to be. The reason for the three branches of government is to check, recheck and balance the governors of our country. However, the business of politics was never conceived to become so viscous and hateful.

With their hatred for the non-conforming, undiplomatic and forthright president, the Democrats have turned politics, not only in Washington D.C., but throughout the country into a blood sport. They have encouraged Antifa to riot by standing by and allowing the members to assault non-members (actually drawing blood and injuring upstanding citizens) with impunity.

They drew upon ambiguous and undefined language to issue two Articles of Impeachment which were voted on and passed by partisan vote. They have upended the state of politics for coming presidents forever. To identify a president’s thoughts as criminal or misdemeanors of impeachable capacity is very dangerous to the character of government and the nation.

Nancy Pelosi probably best described the Democrat strategy in 2017, <link>

This is not the first time a ranking member or leader in the Democrat controlled House or Senate has foregone the rules of normalcy to achieve an underhanded victory. Harry Reid is a testament to that. He introduced the “nuclear option” to the Senate to block filibuster and discussion of controversial presidential nominees with the exception of Supreme Court nominees. In doing so, he eternally altered voting process of the Senate. He won that round, but the tolerant, understanding and accepting Democrats now cry foul when the Republican majority uses that very move.

Now we have a president who has been “impeached forever” in the Speaker’s words. They have impeached President Trump not for cause, but because. In doing so, they, the majority in the House (this time it’s Democrats) have changed the landscape for the most important action the body can take.

There is no known reason for the abject hatred of President Trump other than the fact that he is President Trump. He defeated the predesignated “Queen of the White House” and that seems to be enough for the Democrats to continue attacking him and obstructing his presidency.

I did not vote for Trump in 2016. I didn’t and don’t agree with much of his direct rhetoric, yet I cannot fault him for his forthrightness and openness. There is no question about his thinking because he shares it loudly and often. This is very unlike any previous politician. But he is not a politician and is not beholden to various lobbying groups or even the pressure of his own party. Those are among the various reasons why he is disliked in Washington. He cannot be influenced with fame or fortune…he had them both before he decided to run for office and will forever be known and wealthy without compromising his integrity, such as it is.

Despite his lack of protocol but given the malicious and nefarious behavior of the Democrats over the past 3+ years, there is no way I will vote to install another. Regardless of the policies professed, I will not vote for a Democrat running for local, county, state and certainly not federal office. If that means voting to re-elect President Trump, I will.

DEMOCRATS NEVER LOSE

February 3, 2020

In their own minds, Democrats never lose. The political faction of liberals and progressives are known as Democrats and they refuse to accept any loss. Thus, they never lose.

A quick look at some recent history of elections tells the story.

Mr. Hanging Chad cannot be forgotten. In 2000, Al Gore lost the State of Florida and it’s 25 electoral votes giving George W. Bush a win with 271 electoral votes to Gore’s 266. After weeks of partisan bickering and multiple recounts by a Democrat controlled elections commission, Bush was declared the winner. Gore claimed to have been cheated out of the presidency and George W. Bush was an illegitimate president.

Vindictively, almost all the “W” keys were removed from White House computers prior to Bush’s inauguration.

To this day, Hillary Clinton tours the countryside telling anyone who will listen how she won the presidential election of 2016. She claims that because she received a greater percentage of the popular vote (2.86 million votes), she is by default the president, yet was denied the White House simply because she is female. Electoral College be damned despite the assurances the Founding Fathers gave to the people of rural areas that their vote is as worthy as those amassed in the cities.

Stacey Abrams of Georgia, on the other hand, refuses to accept the popular vote count of her state and brags that she is the rightful heir to the governor’s mansion. Though the election, deemed fair and lawful was held in 2018, Ms. Abrams refuses to concede the loss to this day.

With a deficit of more than 50,000 votes, Stacey cited voter suppression, and black voters in particular because the voter roles had been recently purged of people no longer allowed to vote in GA, in particular dead people. The lawsuit she filed was found to be without substantiation. In her own words, “I have no empirical evidence that I would have achieved a higher number of votes. However, I have sufficient and I think legally sufficient doubt about the process to say that it was not a fair election.”

With the adoption of the Articles of Impeachment, Nancy had to hush (almost threateningly) the Democrats who became giddy when they forgot it was a solemn and somber day that they had to impeach a sitting president. However, she later stated that the president would not be acquitted because it is impossible to hold a trial in which there are no new witnesses. This is a win-win for Democrats. The president will, in her words, be “impeached forever” by the House, but cannot be legitimately acquitted by the Senate.

When confronted with facts or reason contrary to their argument, liberals will always win. They do it by yelling “you’re a racist” or “you’re a bigot” or “you’re a homophobe” (transphobe where applicable) or some such thing and walking away. It is then up to the reasoned individual to disprove the negative allegation. Always a win for liberals!

IS THERE A WHISTLE BLOWER? WAS THERE EVER ONE?

January 25, 2020

There was so much talk about a “whistle blower” who started the whole current Trump impeachment beat down. However, there has been an extreme and extended effort on the part of Adam Schiff and his merry band of anti-Trumpers to suppress, obscure and even disguise the identity of that individual…if he or she even exists.

This appears to be another of Shifty’s claims like “there is indisputable” and “there is overwhelming evidence”, so don’t even think about questioning it. “It’s true, it’s honest, thus we don’t have to provide any proof of such because it is self-evident”.

Schiff, Nadler and other coup strategists say they are protecting the individual from retaliation as provided by the whistle blower law. The problem with that statement is that there is no such provision in the law. The law, as written by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), protects a whistle blower from workplace retaliation, not identity disclosure by Congress. The law from https://www.whistleblowers.gov/ :

Because an adverse action can be subtle, it may not always be easy to spot. Examples of adverse actions include, but are not limited to:

firing or laying off, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, disciplining, denying benefits, failing to hire or rehire, intimidation or harassment, making threats, reassignment to a less desirable position or actions affecting prospects for promotion (such as excluding an employee from training meetings), reducing pay or hours, more subtle actions, such as isolating, ostracizing, mocking, or falsely accusing the employee of poor performance, blacklisting (intentionally interfering with an employee’s ability to obtain future employment), constructive discharge (quitting when an employer makes working conditions intolerable due to the employee’s protected activity)”

Even in the written law, it is obvious that in order to protect the person from workplace retaliation, his or her identity must be known. Otherwise, dismissal of the person, for any reason, within a reasonable time frame thereafter might be assumed to be directed malice. Concealment can only be accepted because, in Adam’s words, “it is self-evident”.

Understanding the above and taking into consideration that the official whistle blower complaint was obviously written by a lawyer or team of lawyers, not a third or fourth level bureaucrat concerned with national security, is it unreasonable to question if there is truly an individual behind the scheme?

Congressional Democrats and others have pledged and threatened to impeach Donald J. Trump since the day he won the nomination of the Republican party. They had the man and for over three years now they have been seeking a way to remove him from office. They don’t even bother to deny the fact. They impeached him on innuendo, allegations and accusations using vague language in the Articles of Impeachment and a highly partisan majority vote in the House. President Trump was impeached because Washington bureaucrats cannot buy him or coerce him politically.

President Trump should wear the impeachment as a badge of honor. He’s brash, boisterous, undiplomatic and unapologetic. He has shown the desk and office attendants in Washington D.C. that things can be accomplished and for that they all hate him. He is, and should, be proud.

To an average aware person, it looks like the “whistle blower’ is a chimera used to launch a bogus impeachment inquiry. It worked. The president has been impeached. Now we must wait through a trial to see what comes of the sinister effort.

2020 SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES

December 9, 2019

Looking at the candidates to defeat the nationalist currently holding office in D.C., one is bound to see some pretty wild characters and plots to overthrow the people of the United States.

Yes, I called the president a nationalist. I find he is neither a conservative nor a liberal. He might most closely resemble a libertarian, but he is not at all a libertarian. He is a strong defender of the U.S. Constitution, law and order from the military to the local level. He believes in a federal government limited in size and scope that is yet powerful enough to conduct business on behalf of the greater number of citizens throughout the country.

President Trump, as I have stated many times before in my posts, is not the person I would like to have representing my country. He is, however, showing to be the best and most capable person to lead this country at this time.

That said, the field of opposition to him in the 2020 election is bothersome to me and many other citizen patriots. We see the potential of losing the freedoms granted in the Constitution and the threat of forced acquiescence and servitude to an overarching government.

Looking at the remaining field of candidates running under the Democrat party (this is not a typo. I do not believe there is any remaining democracy in the people who call themselves Democrats). What appears on stage and in front of any available “reporter” are a troupe of individuals who proudly voice their will to overthrow our current economic, political and social structures in favor of a governing form known to have failed each and every time it has been attempted throughout history, leaving the citizens humiliated and in abject poverty.

With a population in excess of three hundred million, undermining our capitalist economic system in favor of socialism would not only destroy our country, but cause a reorder of the entire world of countries. It is a step toward globalism that could only ultimately create more warring factions with greater weaponry than exist today,

Just two of the policies proudly offered by the most prominent candidates will bankrupt the country within one four year presidential term. Those policies are open borders and universal health care (Medicare-for-All). Any thinking person can see how inviting the world’s unhealthy to partake of our free medical service would devastate any economic system within a few years, if not a matter of months.

Currently, people of means from around the globe come to America to receive the medical care they cannot get, or cannot get on a life-saving timeline, under the socialist systems of their home governments.

Add to the above proposal giving each person qualifying for any public assistance program (medicaid, SNAP, EBT, WIC, TANF, CHIP, LIHEAP, SSI, Section 8 housing assistance and more) $1,000 per month and you have the makings of a subservient population rather than one of independence offering contributory value.

The candidates, through their like-minded minions, have destroyed or removed from view symbols of our history and chronological writings of our forefathers. By eliminating contemporary journals and rewriting history, it is possible to educate upcoming generations with only one view of the possible. By offering “equality” to all through free entitlements, without a history of how such has destroyed societies, any desired goal is achievable no matter how irrational it is.

If there were another candidate with the mindset and capabilities of the current president, with a more likable persona, he or she would get my vote. As of today, I don’t see that person.