WE HAVE ALREADY EXPERIENCED OUR FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT

August 17, 2016

Hillary continues to assert that it is time for a woman president and that she alone is the one to fill that pant suit position. However, I contend that there has been a woman in charge of the nation’s happenings since the election in 2008 and it is not Michelle <link>.

Since early in his first term, I have questioned Obama’s ability to make decisions and execute plans in the best interest of our country. (The fact that he needs Teleprompters with phonetic spelling to pronounce his own name correctly should be a giveaway.) The best interest for us and our country, in my opinion, is for individual and national leadership, responsibility, safety and prosperity. Taking 16 hours, or put another way allowing escape and evasion time, to send the most highly trained field troops to capture or kill Osama Bin Laden is not leadership.

From the beginning we have seen that the current cabal in Washington D.C. has quite a different set of goals in mind. While each statement uttered from behind the podium with the presidential seal sounds correct, each action taken has been quite the opposite. There is as much spin and deception coming from the top billed actors <link> as there is from the stammering press secretaries and spokes persons of the various agencies as they try to cover for the directed players.

Hillary claims that she is the only one who has the experience to effectively run the country and interact with world leaders. Again, I suggest that for the past 7+ years the country has, in essence, been run by a woman – a black woman, Valerie Jarrett. Certainly by this time Hillary has fulfilled sufficient favors for tyrants and dictators around the globe as requested. As a national figurehead as opposed to a department head, the title would keep her in position to continue the trend. Giving away our national secrets, security and sovereignty in exchange for personal cash is, after all, the established Clinton way.

Clinton, like so many other political insiders, is not a governor, she is not a leader, she is a front liner for those who govern and lead from behind the curtain. There is a government behind the government that we see only when looking into the shadows. <link>

This is why Donald Trump is so despised by not only the progressive Democrats but the entrenched Republicans as well. He is unaccustomed to being told how to run an organization. Because he has done exceedingly well by hiring and listening to top echelon advisors, it is feared he will continue this pattern as president. He will undoubtedly seek the best and brightest for his cabinet, department heads, Pentagon officials and the like and take their advice to heart. But the fear is that he will not follow the orders of the leaders of the country. It would be a very, very bad thing to have an independent and responsible thinker and doer in charge.

 

THE PARTY OF NO REMORSE

August 12, 2016

Hillary Clinton, her husband Bill, Barack Obama and fellow progressives show no remorse for their criminal actions. In fact, it seems the entire Democrat party has consumed some of the same pharmaceuticals making them all become sociopaths. It is not the Democrat party of old. They are now the party of the unrepentant. There is no contrition for the actions which they try to cover in a blanket of lies. When called for their “misstatements” they lie about what was said and / or the meaning of the original lie. They will continue to deny, delay, deflect, misdirect, obfuscate and lie until indignantly shouting months later, “What difference, at this point, does it make?” to a congressional investigative committee.

Of course who can forget the bent finger admonition to the American public, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinski” or the latest mendacity from our current Liar-In-Chief, “We do not pay ransom. We didn’t here, and we won’t in the future”. *Note: They come so fast this may not be the latest by the time of publication.

Sociopath

noun, Psychiatry.

1. a person with a psychopathic personality whose behavior is antisocial, often criminal, and who lacks a sense of moral responsibility or social conscience.

The IRS virtually handed the 2012 election to Obama by denying or delaying non-profit status to myriad conservative groups. That lack of timely processing denied taxpaying citizens the opportunity to raise money and counter his campaign. For this, Lois Lerner was not only not prosecuted as she should have been, she was allowed paid administrative leave (vacation time) and then full retirement with benefits valued in excess of $200,000 per year.

More recently, Debbie Wasserman Schultz was dismissed as chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee for manipulatively assuring Hillary Clinton’s primary victory over Bernie Sanders. Within hours of her ouster, she was publicly promoted as the National Chairman for the Clinton campaign proving once again that if you are a Democrat, and you are crooked enough, you are rewarded handsomely. Remorse, no. High fives for distinctive accomplishments, yes.

They, the progressive Democrats, consistently work above the law and are often excused for doing so. Recent observations indicate that they are now backed by the Department of Justice (criminal in itself). The FBI, too, seems compliant if not collusive. Director Comey laid out a perfect case for indicting Hillary Clinton regarding her email debacle concluding that he would not make an indictment recommendation to the Department of Injustice. Likewise, Loretta Lynch refused FBI requests to initiate an investigation into the Clinton Global Initiative that by all appearances is little more than a channel between foreign political operatives or manipulators and the pockets of the Clintons.

In the words of Senator Cruz, “Vote your conscience”. If you believe your representatives, especially those of the highest order, are worthy of acting in contra-legal ways with impunity by all means vote against our Democratic Republic. If you have any intelligent kids and grand-kids, expect them to despise you for the suffering they endure under the oncoming Marxist / socialist / dictatorship you chose to promote. However, I’m sure you’ll show no remorse.

HATING TED CRUZ

July 25, 2016

Ted Cruz is not the love of the Republican party. He is certainly despised by Democrats.  Ted is not politically correct.  He follows his heart.  This doesn’t make him a Washington outsider though. He is firmly ensconced in his party and his beliefs. He made that clear at the Republican convention this past week.

Everybody’s still talking about the non-endorsement of Donald Trump. Though Ted’s name has come up in every news article, talking head program on every radio station and every TV channel from MSNBC to FOX since last Wednesday evening, few review the speech he gave. Most pundits are taken aback by the fact that he showed up and gave a speech at the convention without formally blessing the Republican nominee. There are few good words for Ted right now.

He held true to his convictions. What more can you ask from a conservative? His wife was maligned by the Trump campaign without cause. Would you endorse the head of such an organization if your spouse was maliciously impugned?

Watch and listen, once again, to the speech as it was captured by CNN. http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/20/rnc-convention-ted-cruz-entire-speech-sot.cnn

It was impassioned. It related conservative values…states’ rights, human rights, citizen’s rights. It covered it all. He mentioned a wall to keep Americans safe. The speech identified the need for reasoned trade policies that put America’s interests first. He defined the differences between the major parties. He promoted our military and law enforcement officers.  It was a good speech!

He incorporated many of the ideas Trump has touted. He said, “vote your conscience”. I.e. If you believe Trump is the man, by all means vote for him. He was principled. He held to his beliefs. He simply did not ravingly endorse Donald Trump. Don’t condemn the man for being true to himself, God and the American people.

Though he is not my first choice for president at this time, he expressed all the values in which I believe and that are needed to overcome the damage done to my country in the last 7+ years. Hillary certainly won’t help. Perhaps Trump can.

PERMISSION GRANTED

July 18, 2016

Thanks in large part to our Community Organizer in Chief, ambushing police and riots are now commonplace. Violence abounds. There is unrest in every pocket and every major city across the nation and it is seemingly being promoted by our current administration and endorsed by his justice department.

Each time there is an incident in which innocents are killed, President Obummer addresses the nation and two things happen. First, there is an insincere placating to the families involved. Second, and almost within the same sentence, comes a statement about how Muslims or blacks (depending on the specific situation) have been oppressed since the beginning of time and therefore righteously rebelling against white men and police is justified and acceptable. He is effectively granting permission for violence and killing.

There are other forces contributing as well. If it isn’t directly political as in Hillary escaping an FBI criminal investigation where Director Comey publicly justified indictment yet set her free without such recommendation or Donald Trump hurling true but volatile remarks, it’s Black Lives Matter projecting animus toward law enforcement or the New Black Panther Party (one of the president’s favorites along with The Muslim Brotherhood) calling for the killing of all whites and cops. As soon as that settles, our president finds the words to enflame another situation.

This happened in Dallas recently because of two incidents involving police officers and black men. I have reviewed the publicly available videos of the shootings in both Baton Rouge. LA and St. Paul, MN. According to the footage made public, both might be considered questionable shootings. But that assessment is made on limited information.  I was not there for either and felt no fear for my own life.  We’ll know more as time develops the stories.

As of this writing, the police death toll in Dallas is five with seven other officers wounded. The gunman wearing an armored vest. An ambush in Baton Rouge has left three police officers dead and several wounded.

Police patrol and do their job enforcing laws with trepidation now because approaching any suspect can mean their death or maiming. Simply being on the street has seen 8+ of America’s brave lose their lives in the past two weeks. Thus, they act quickly and with angst. The reasonable concern for their own lives causes rapid aggression and reaction without forethought. The recent spate of ambushes can only cause quicker to reaction to a sudden movement or refusal to comply with their commands.

Radicals are taking over in anarchy, without forethought but with direction and guidance, subtle or outright, from the leaders of national organizations local authorities and our president and his justice department.

At least one report says that Democrat Cleveland Mayor, Frank G. Jackson, has issued a “Stand Down” order to his police force during the Republican convention. Essentially, he has given protesters permission to riot in the streets. It worked so well in Baltimore!

And, like Baltimore, this usually results in looting and burning local businesses. Tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary destruction is likely to occur in Cleveland. The anarchy is escalating and currently looks like it will not stop soon. The disregard for law and order generally associated with third world and socialist and monarchal governed (redundancy acknowledged) countries is here.

BOILING FROGS

July 13, 2016

I’m sure that even the ignorant, selfish, complacent, under-educated millenials have heard the story of how to boil a frog. But for those still not aware, here’s how it goes.

If you put a frog in boiling water, it will jump out. However, if you place a frog in room temperature water it will swim around happily. Turn up the heat slowly and the frog will not notice the difference. It will unwittingly accept new or changing environment until it is cooked to death in the boiling water.

This is what has happened over the past seven and a half years.

In 2007, I said that it was “time for a black man to be president, just not this black man” (meaning Obama). He scared me when he said he was going to “fundamentally transform America”. I didn’t believe then and I don’t believe now that America needed any fundamental change. Perhaps some adjusting or massaging in some areas, but not total and complete change.

The words of his wife bothered me even more. Her words: “We are going to have to change our conversation; we’re going to have to change our traditions, our history; we’re going to have to move into a different place as a nation.” — Michelle Obama, May 14, 2008

Those words, from them both, lit the flame under the nation’s frogs – us.

With each speech he gives regarding the nation, he slyly embeds some subliminal wording to inflame the most aggressive and radical activists. It’s part of his training and education as a community organizer. He does it well.

At first, he subtly pushed for more restraint on law enforcement. Then he, using his calculated oratory, fostered the notion that “standing up” to the unequal application of the law between whites and blacks would gain them respect. From there he has reiterated the perceived disparity again and again until some believe it necessary to engage every officer at every opportunity. When they do defy the authority, whether they’re right or wrong, it sets the stage not for dialog but adversarial aggravation.

Each time the President brings to the forefront old standards or history long past such as slavery and Jim Crow laws, it arouses an ire within the ancestors of the oppressed. That resurfaced anger, though the issues were dealt with and corrected decades ago, again becomes an issue for immediate reconciliation and foments unnecessary disquiet.

As the pot continues to heat, we are now at the point where, to blacks, it is acceptable to fight the local authorities constantly. Often now, they are initiating unnecessary situations that can only turn out badly. Calling for the killing of police is sure to cause angst.

Sorry, gotta go now, Obama’s bringing in a new pot.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 56 other followers