There was so much talk about a “whistle blower” who started the whole current Trump impeachment beat down. However, there has been an extreme and extended effort on the part of Adam Schiff and his merry band of anti-Trumpers to suppress, obscure and even disguise the identity of that individual…if he or she even exists.
This appears to be another of Shifty’s claims like “there is indisputable” and “there is overwhelming evidence”, so don’t even think about questioning it. “It’s true, it’s honest, thus we don’t have to provide any proof of such because it is self-evident”.
Schiff, Nadler and other coup strategists say they are protecting the individual from retaliation as provided by the whistle blower law. The problem with that statement is that there is no such provision in the law. The law, as written by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), protects a whistle blower from workplace retaliation, not identity disclosure by Congress. The law from https://www.whistleblowers.gov/ :
“Because an adverse action can be subtle, it may not always be easy to spot. Examples of adverse actions include, but are not limited to:
firing or laying off, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, disciplining, denying benefits, failing to hire or rehire, intimidation or harassment, making threats, reassignment to a less desirable position or actions affecting prospects for promotion (such as excluding an employee from training meetings), reducing pay or hours, more subtle actions, such as isolating, ostracizing, mocking, or falsely accusing the employee of poor performance, blacklisting (intentionally interfering with an employee’s ability to obtain future employment), constructive discharge (quitting when an employer makes working conditions intolerable due to the employee’s protected activity)”
Even in the written law, it is obvious that in order to protect the person from workplace retaliation, his or her identity must be known. Otherwise, dismissal of the person, for any reason, within a reasonable time frame thereafter might be assumed to be directed malice. Concealment can only be accepted because, in Adam’s words, “it is self-evident”.
Understanding the above and taking into consideration that the official whistle blower complaint was obviously written by a lawyer or team of lawyers, not a third or fourth level bureaucrat concerned with national security, is it unreasonable to question if there is truly an individual behind the scheme?
Congressional Democrats and others have pledged and threatened to impeach Donald J. Trump since the day he won the nomination of the Republican party. They had the man and for over three years now they have been seeking a way to remove him from office. They don’t even bother to deny the fact. They impeached him on innuendo, allegations and accusations using vague language in the Articles of Impeachment and a highly partisan majority vote in the House. President Trump was impeached because Washington bureaucrats cannot buy him or coerce him politically.
President Trump should wear the impeachment as a badge of honor. He’s brash, boisterous, undiplomatic and unapologetic. He has shown the desk and office attendants in Washington D.C. that things can be accomplished and for that they all hate him. He is, and should, be proud.
To an average aware person, it looks like the “whistle blower’ is a chimera used to launch a bogus impeachment inquiry. It worked. The president has been impeached. Now we must wait through a trial to see what comes of the sinister effort.
bizarroworldusa.wordpress.com 