Posts Tagged ‘Marx’


September 6, 2017

I recognize that those who most need to read this and other like articles are the least likely to do so. It destroys their implanted narrative and thus must be rejected outright without review or consideration.

It doesn’t take a mental giant, or even an semi-intelligent public school graduate, to see there is a movement afoot to destroy the United States. Unfortunately, most of the imbued high school graduates and certainly the products of many four year colleges are so indoctrinated with “free” and “equal” and “diversity” and “acceptance” that critical thinking and reasoned observation is not within their purview. They cannot see or accept economic, social or political reality and cannot recognize what they are conditioned to bring about.

Today’s scholars, professors and teachers are bred on the disciplines of Saul Alinsky and Karl Marx. Marx predicted that the internal class struggle of a capitalist society would produce self destruction resulting ultimately in a socialist society. He professed socialism or an ideal classless society such as communism would result. Alinsky popularized the thinking of Marx and directed the initialization of his philosophy.

Alinsky alleged that the best method to effect change is to first create chaos of the highest order. He became the figurehead of the counter-culture movement of the 1960s and 1970s and is the mentor of the liberal journalists, teachers, professors and politicians (the reporters, guides and governors) of today.

Many of our current and recent generations, seduced by the authority of their “educators”, see only the initial and seductive stages of the socialist and communist doctrines. They have been drilled with the notion that these economic and political creeds result in global and total equality; everyone prospers from the efforts and production of the collective. The poverty and starvation that decades of submission to these philosophies is not admitted in the indoctrination. Only the ultimately infeasible Utopian representation is offered and revered.

From the chaotic state, the masses will accept any change to calm or abate the state of turbulence. That change comes in the form of socialism and ultimately communism. A soothing transition from capitalism and democracy might be termed Democratic Socialism; the first step to authoritarian dominance.

Each leader among the disciples of these philosophies believes he or she is the one to make the transition complete and viable. Every one who has tried has failed and each society transformed has suffered. The chieftains of the attempts often die under unexpected and mysterious circumstances only to be followed by stronger figures. The proles of these regimes toil endlessly for their meager existence while the elite governing class becomes enriched.

*Note the referral to two classes of these “equality for all” socio-political comradeships. This, in itself, illustrates a major contradiction to the professed uniform prosperity.

Without direct and personal incentive to produce and prosper for one’s self and family, there is little reason to work at capacity for others to benefit. Feudalism does not enhance the wealth of society. It drains the wealth from it.

I refer you to the totalitarian reign of the former USSR. For those with less historical background or initiative to do the research, read the current news coming out of Venezuela. Both of these nation states passed through the stage of Marxism, into socialism and into autocracies whereby the masses became starving chattel of the dictators.

Capitalism and democracy may not be the best forms of economy, government and civilization for it, too, is flawed. However, it has proven to be among the best for the greatest majority within. We, the U.S., are now at a negative point of transition away from personal responsibility and reward to that of dominance and submissiveness. With each new entitlement easing the need for self reliance, we move closer and closer to the proven failures of totalitarianism.

The United States is now in a hybrid state whereby public welfare is surpassed by government give-away programs. Charitably helping the infirm and incapable through public support is beneficial to a social and civilized community. However, making the lazy and sedentary comfortable and dependent with luxuries such as internet service, cell phones, monthly stipends, housing allowances and other benefits robs them of pride and incentive and allows the government to lord over them. The passive recipients democratically vote for more of the same not realizing they are electively contributing to their own servitude and that of their descendants.

The anarchists we see in the streets today are only ignorant players, for the most part. They falsely believe they are contributing to constructive societal change. Some are paid to organize and engage in protests and riots as suggested by Alinsky; to create chaos. The rest are dupes acting ignorantly, or on partial information regarding the projected outcome of their participation. Most are oblivious to the historical mistakes of multiple attempts to alter the social order. They are unaware of their contribution to totalitarianism.



January 3, 2013

“There’s more work to do to reduce our deficits, and I’m willing to do it,” Obama commented about the latest attempt at diverting the fiscal cliff.  In Obama speak, he is actually saying, “Read my lips, under my plan your taxes will necessarily skyrocket”.

Obama keeps pledging that he will not raise taxes on the middle and lower-income groups.  In the Obama paradigm, if he says anything that sounds sane or reasonable, the inverse is most likely happening in his mind.  He and his cadre of  minions continue to impose costly regulations on businesses and individuals.  “We the People”, of all income categories, pay the price of these unnecessary and downright inane compliance mandates.  The money being put into the coffers of the government is then wastefully spent.  He keeps demanding more spending and imposing more taxes in the form of fees and fines, but no amount of fiscal rape of citizens will ever mitigate the ever-increasing debt.

The idea is to break the country.   Remember his quote from 2007, “I’m in this race not just to hold an office, but to gather with you to transform a nation”.  The transformation to which he refers is from a nation of prosperity with rich, poor, and middle classes; one in which individuals can move upward through their efforts, into one where every person has a designated station in life from which ascension is nearly impossible.

The latest deal from congress includes an income tax increase for families making over $450k per year.  That is a direct attack on the middle class.  Unfunded spending, however, continues without budget constraints.  The debt ceiling must again be raised amid calls from the socialist left for continued spending without congressional or Constitutional restrictions.

To His Majesty Obama, adherence to the teachings of Saul Alinsky, is glorious compromise.  “But to the organizer, compromise is a key and beautiful word.  It is always present in the pragmatics of operation.  It is making the deal, getting that vital breather, usually the victory.  If you start with nothing, demand 100 per cent, then compromise for 30 per cent, you’re 30 per cent ahead”.  Rules for Radicals P.59

For the past four years Obama has stated that he wants to return to the previous income tax rates for everyone making over $250k per year.  Household income of $250k simply makes a family comfortable and able to enjoy the fruits of their toil.  It does not make them rich.  To take more of their earnings for the government to spend foolishly is sure to deflate the economy further.  Karl Marx would be proud of Obama.

After the fiscal cliff “deal” was finalized on Tuesday night, without hesitation, Obama stated that this win would only be the beginning for his “balanced approach” to deficit reduction and that more tax increases are on the horizon in masque of the massive and unwarranted spending.

“We can’t simply cut our way to prosperity. Cutting spending has to go hand-in-hand with further reforms to our tax code so that the wealthiest corporations and individuals can’t take advantage of loopholes and deductions that aren’t available to most Americans. And we can’t keep cutting things like basic research and new technology and still expect to succeed in a 21st century economy.  *Note – there is no mention or forethought to cutting spending for ongoing research of fairy shrimp habitat.  So we’re going to have to continue to move forward in deficit reduction, but we have to do it in a balanced way, making sure that we are growing even as we get a handle on our spending . . .”

Meanwhile, despite working Americans at all income levels struggling to make ends meet, in many cases watching inflation etch away at their savings, Obama, via Executive Order attempted to reward his already well compensated loyal followers with pay increases.


We are so very, very fortunate to have at least four more years of Obama’s destruction of our once great country.